Archive for the ‘Wikis’ Category

No. That’s Not Your Name!

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

As someone whose research and teaching center on modern Eastern Europe, the most recent news from across the Atlantic is just more fodder for a great lecture. For the umpteenth time, the Greek government has vetoed Macedonia’s entry into a European structure–in this case NATO–because those pesky Macedonians persist in calling their country Macedonia. Can you believe the nerve of those guys?

If you have followed events in the Balkans since 1989 at all, you know that this particular comic opera is one of the few comedic moments since the wars in the former Yugoslavia began. If you haven’t been following Balkan events, read on to find out why the Macedonian ambassador to the United Nations has to site behind a nameplate that reads FYROM rather than Macedonia. That’s Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia for those not up on the abbreviations.

The root of the problem is a dispute about history, which is why this story makes a good lecture topic. Any Greek nationalist worth his or her stripes will tell you that the ancient kingdom of Macedon was a Greek state. And any Macedonian nationalist worth his or her stripes would shake his or her head and with great weariness remind you that, no, Macedon was a Macedonian kingdom and so when Alexander the Great conquered the rest of the Greek states, Greece became Macedonian, not the other way around.

For something like 2,000 years no one thought to argue about whether that territory north of what is now the Greek state was or wasn’t Macedonia. But in the late 19th century the new Balkan kingdoms of Serbia, Bulgaria, and Greece all cast their covetous eyes on the place. During the Balkan Wars that preceded World War I, some of the worst fighting was in and over Macedonia.

After World War II, though, the real trouble started, because Greek communist fighters operating out of Yugoslavia tried to topple the Greek government and many Greeks came to believe that Tito had named his country’s southernmost province Macedonia as a way of claiming sovereignty over northern Greece.

But so what? The communist insurgency failed and Yugoslavia behaved. The name of that southern Yugoslav province still rankled plenty of people in Greece, but in the end, what was there to do? I suppose there are people in Mexico who don’t like the fact that the United States has a state called New Mexico either.

The real trouble started after the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991. Can you believe it? The people who call themselves “Macedonians” and who speak a language called “Macedonian” decided to call their new country “Macedonia.”

No! No! No! The Greeks shouted. Posters, buttons, bumper stickers, even patriotic songs (in Greek) trumpeted the slogan “Macedonia is Greek!” And the Greek government used its leverage as a NATO, EC (later EU) and UN member to prevent the newly independent Macedonian state from calling itself Macedonia, hence the FYROM compromise.

When I was living in Slovakia in the mid-1990s I met a American human rights lawyer who was working in Macedonia. He had recently traveled to Greece for a conference and when he crossed the border into northern Greece, the border guards stamped “Invalidated” (in Greek) on his Macedonian visa and work permit. Not surprisingly, when he returned to Macedonia, the Macedonian border guards just shrugged and snickered at those silly Greek border guards.

As recently as this past February, the U.S. State Department proposed what we might call the “New Mexico” solution, trying to convince the Macedonians to call their state “New Macedonia” in their membership in various multilateral organizations like NATO and the UN. Wisely, the Macedonians declined.

During the height of the first phase of this controversy in the 1990s, a Bulgarian friend told me that Bulgaria’s foreign minister had proposed that the Macedonians try something similar. His suggestion was that they call their country “Not Macedonia”. That way, whenever the Greeks complained, they could say, “But it’s Not Macedonia.” I have no idea if this story is true or not, but if it is, I think it’s the best solution anyone has come up with.

I’ll conclude by pointing out that the Macedonians are definitely winning the naming dispute, all aggravations about NATO membership to the contrary. The Wikipedia entry for Macedonia calls the country the Republic of Macedonia or just Macedonia. And if Wikipedia says that’s your name, well, that’s your name…isn’t it?

[NB: After two weeks of energetic discussion by a number of readers (see the comments below), I have cut off comments on this post, in part because the discussion had ceased to be civil. TMK]

Wiki Etiquette for Students

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

The folks at PBWiki.com have created an Educators’ Wiki that includes a number of useful resources for those who are using wikis in their classes. I’ve used the PBWiki platform in my classes before with good success, but it is just one of many possible wiki platforms out there. I do like the page on wiki etiquette for students, because it offers them a pretty comprehensive guide to how to use and behave on a wiki site. For me this will be particularly important in coming semesters because I’m considering having my students create a class wiki in the fall rather than me setting up a blog site as I have in semesters past.

Since I’ve been so happy with blogs (and have written about my happiness numerous times here), why would I change to a wiki? Part of the reason is that I’m one of those instructors who is constantly changing things in my classroom, always looking for the best way to get my students learning what I want them to learn. But in this particular instance, the main reason is that I’m still finding the blog conversation in my classes to be a little artificial. The students still mostly use the blog to answer questions I pose, rather than taking off and writing for themselves.

So my hope is that with a wiki they may just take control of the class website themselves, deciding what content should be included, amended, etc. And the creation of a wiki will help them understand even more how larger wiki projects like Wikipedia work. I will continue to require them to write a Wikipedia entry as I have done in semesters past, but this time around that assignment will be more of a warm up for the main online work of the semester.

The Archives Wiki (2)

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

Last week I wrote about the Archives Wiki at the American Historical Association’s website. A reader of the other blog I write for left a comment informing me of a different sort of archive wiki–the Your Archives Wiki at the UK National Archives. This project, still in beta, allows members of the “online community of records users” to write about and update information on items in the collections of the National Archives. Like the Flickr Commons project I wrote about recently, the Your Archives project seeks to leverage the fund of knowledge that its records users have about individual items in the collection. In this way, a large institutional repository can begin to take advantage of the collective wisdom of the larger community to improve both its services and the information it holds and dispenses.

One of the things I particularly like about the Your Archives project is the ease with which users can send corrections or other informational updates to staff at the Archives. On the less positive side, this project also seems intended to help the Archives generate revenue through the sale of individual documents. As I poked around in the wiki I followed a link from a soldier’s diary to the original at the main Archives site. For the not trifling sum of 3.5 pounds, I could obtain a .pdf of the original document.

Now, if I were a researcher here in the U.S. who really needed that particular document, a few pounds is a small price to pay for instant access. But what if I needed 20 or 30 of these diaries? The cost would add up quickly. It would be very interesting to see what would happen if I were to purchase that particular diary, then post the entire contents back into the Your Archives wiki, thereby making the source open source rather than closed source. I don’t suspect we’ll see much of this subversion of the intent of the project, if only because doing something like what I just suggested is time consuming, not to mention expensive.

Despite what I just wrote, I am sympathetic to the National Archives’ apparent desire to recapture some revenue from the digitalization of these records. I don’t know the funding context in the UK, but our own National Archives here in the U.S. is perennially strapped for funds to do just this sort of thing and if they could recover some of that cost through ease of access projects like this one, I suspect they would.

At the same time, however, there is the thornier question of the purpose of a national archive. If these archives are indeed public trusts, then shouldn’t they make their information available to the public for free?